Maman Poulet | Clucking away crookedly through media, politics and life

7 year olds and Austerity Politics

April 18th, 2012 · Irish Politics, Social Policy

The Social Welfare Bill 2012 begins its journey through the Oireachtas tonight . It proposes changes to the entitlement to the One Parent Family Payment, Pension age qualification and also will introduce new fraud control measures.

There has been very little said in public discourse about the changes to the One Parent Family payment and the fact that in two years time lone parents will not receive parenting support when their child reaches 7 years of age and if they are not in work will have to apply for jobseekers allowance.

Since 80% of lone parents are either working or in education and there is no child care support outside of the part time year between 3 and 4 years of age, where are children over the age of 7 to be supported in the future?  There were changes proposed by previous governments which would have seen a reduction in the age of the child supported by the payment but would also have examined employment supports and childcare provision for those affected.  No such plans are provided for in this bill under debate this week.

7 is too Young is a campaign led by a partnership comprising Open, Barnardos and the National Women’s Council of Ireland. They oppose the changes because

  • There isn’t enough after-school childcare and no plan in place to provide it.
  • There aren’t enough jobs.
  • We don’t have a social welfare system that supports those in Jobseekers to work part-time which is a reality or a choice for many lone parents.
  • We don’t have enough education & training places for those who are already on the Dole.
  • We believe that poverty, especially child poverty, will increase among lone parents if this Bill passes.
  • Unemployed lone parents will be at the bottom of the pile on the Dole. This means they will be the last grouping to receive active support to get into work.
  • Employed lone parents will have to make the awful choice between trying to work full-time, with little childcare support or moving on to welfare.

And it won’t save any money, more parents will end up unemployed as Jobseekers payments are not payable to people who work part time say over 4 or 5 days a week then many parents will have to give up working altogether.  (More analysis on the impact is available in the OPEN analysis document.)

Some say that One Parent families are supported into long term welfare dependency. However as so many are working or in education maybe it’s the bigger societal and economic system that is broken and not the parents trying to survive and  provide the best opportunities for their families.  They still appear in the most at risk of poverty statistics of the state and will continue to reside there for much longer if these changes go ahead and if there are no jobs or supports into employment provided. But the poor don’t matter in the scheme of things or do they?

The One Parent Family Payment also supports (mainly) mothers to keep their babies ( a lower number are in this position with most lone parents having been in relationships that have broken down for a variety of reasons.) However it is important to note the role of the payment in supporting people who are in crisis about their pregnancy.  Especially important in a state which continues to fail to legislate.  Clare Daly and the technical group are bringing in their private members bill on Medical Termination where the mothers life is at risk. The debate on that bill begins 90 minutes before the Social Welfare Bill 2012.  The government will oppose this bill. The  irony is not lost on me at all.

Austerity politics with no reflection on equality or the impacts and outcomes on people’s lives does not serve anyone well.  One day we might actually continue reform on the flawed system for reform’s sake rather than looking at lifestyle opportunities which do not exist. The proposals feed into myths and discrimination against lone parents because they don’t reflect on the increasingly diverse reasons for and responses to lone parenthood.  And of course there has been no reflection on the role and responsibility of the other parent.

7 is far too young to place a child at risk of consistent poverty (no child should be placed at this risk) and lone parents deserve the opportunity to work and have their role as a parent alone supported. Everyone deserves the chance to work.  However we seem to spend a lot of time talking people out of jobs rather than working on creating them and the people that might take them up.

Share

» 3 CommentsTags:···

Amalgamating rights bodies and eroding equality in the workplace

April 11th, 2012 · Equality, Irish Politics, Social Policy

Last week (when few were watching) Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation Richard Bruton published his detailed plans for amalgamating the various employment rights bodies into a ‘ World Class Employment Relations Service’.  The government had previously announced it’s intention to bring all the functions of the Labour Relations Commission, National Employment Rights Authority and the Equality Tribunal under one roof.  The blue print released last week documents the moves that have been made already to streamline functions and documents the minister’s intentions in the drafting of legislation to produce a ‘one stop shop’.  Since I have a personal and professional interest in equality and anti-discrimination I’m restricting my comments to the proposals significant to these areas.

The reforms outlined will see the Equality Tribunal wound down and it’s functions transferred to the new Workplace Relations Commission.  Discrimination in the workplace, pay or pensions would still be dealt with by the body. But the blue print does not discuss in any way the nature of discrimination in the workplace and the way in which there would be a continued expertise in and support for working on cases where people are discriminated against due to their gender, race, sexual orientation, disability, nationality, Family status, membership of the Travelling Community.

Again this government is proposing to dump equality for fairness and wipe out any concept of promoting anti-discrimination practices in it’s work. (The last government decimated the Equality Authority and Irish Human Rights Commission) Indeed the document has no discussion at all about the need for specialisation or developmental work in promoting equality in the workplace.  This is especially worrying given the numbers of cases being taken under the gender and race grounds of late which show no regard and targeted harassment of pregnant women and mothers for example.  (A search for terms including gender and disability in the document drew a blank).

Further still the Minister proposes that anybody who wants to make a complaint about being unfairly treated in the workplace, badly paid, dismissed or discriminated against on Equality grounds will have to pay a fee to make that complaint. The suggested fee is €50.  This may not sound much but if you are not being paid the minimum wage and want to complain about it or have lost your job due to unfair treatment you are probably not going to be in the position to pay out for seeking your rights. Nor should you be expected to.

The document is very reactive in nature and does not in any detail talk about the concept of promoting rights in a workplace and good practice and supporting workers to have respect given to their terms and conditions.   It is hard to argue that streamlining the services and speeding up access to resolution measures which seems to be the focus of the Minister’s actions (and closing down some quangos ala New Era) will not be excellent for those affected as the delays in taking cases under both equality and other employment rights mechanisms are ridiculously long.

However the document fails to reflect at all on the impact of winding up the Equality Tribunal on the area of discrimination in goods and services for which the Tribunal is currently responsible for.  The Equal Status Act sets out how the rights of people in the nine grounds are protected in respect of accessing goods and services.  If the Tribunal is wound up where will those who are denied access to education, health, shops and other services to go to seek redress?

I wonder what Mervyn Taylor who first worked on the area of creating specialist anti discrimination resolution measures in the 1990’s would say?  And what are Labour saying as yet another area of Equality is insipidly moved into Fairness by their partners in government?  And what of the Trade Unions?  The so called stakeholders?  Are they too standing idly by this dilution? Perhaps too caught up in the changes to the Labour Relations Commission and Labour Court and other areas where they earn their stripes?

The closing date for consultation on the paper is 30 April.  You should tell the Minister what you think about what he proposes before he drafts the legislation to rip everything asunder and maybe copy it to others, however the document states he is not interested in going over old ground and only wants to hear about ‘positive’ suggestions.  So no moaning about rights restrictions or inequality or unfairness of it all.  That’s some consultation!

Share

» 5 CommentsTags:

Fine Gael and the vulnerable, in fairness

April 2nd, 2012 · Irish Politics, Social Policy

The Fine Gael Ard Fheis was low key enough given the state of the country and the ‘need to hit the right note’. Apart that is from the large crowd outside who those inside were not allowed to see for fear we (media/delegates) would antagonise them.

There were 4,000 (depending on who you were reading) present from all over the country and it was the first time they had gathered since the election and they were given the school report by ministers. Most party conferences have long given up on the notion of actual policy debate unless it’s an internal party organisational matter. Ministers and TD’s spent time on stages in uncomfortable armchairs while party members presented motions which are edited and specially chosen and there is a fairly uncontentious vote.

So one looks to ministerial speeches for some notion of policy development or announcement or kite flying for inspiration or explanation for why you might spend the day there at all. And mostly yesterday there was very little if any of that. Again and again ministers set out what they had done, listing the achievements, mentioning their partners in government frequently and from time to time acknowledging the state we are in and ‘we have to remember those who are suffering.’ It was largely humility central, with not a lot of Phil Hogan.

All this combined with the huge convention centre and its comfortable seats and austere setting led to a slow news day.

However I wanted to pick up on a theme that I heard repeated on several occasions which is rare enough at a Fine Gael conference. The mentions of the vulnerable. Mainly these mentions were from Michael Noonan who made specific reference to Older people and how they should be protected from cuts and how society judges people on how they treat the old. He later included children in his thoughts. Of course as it was Fine Gael there were frequent mentions of fairness which is a far far different concept to equality which I didn’t hear mentioned much unless it pertains to gender in politics.

There is no doubt that older people have been largely protected from a lot of the cutting in recent years including during the first year in this new government. However the same cannot be said for children.

Forthcoming legislation which will see children raised in lone parent households (the majority of who were in work or education) put at risk of poverty surely will test this notion of protecting ‘the vulnerable’. The strong speech by Frances Fitzgerald on children’s rights on Friday night cited many problems in the previous administration and their legacy in terms of the amount of work that has to be done to protect the rights of children at risk of all kinds of abuse. However how many of the policies across the health, education, social protection and children’s affairs departments are poverty and rights proofed?

While the work on introducing Children First and reforming child welfare services is onerous, the removal of parental supports to lone parent families is going to leave this group of children at risk, not only in terms of poverty but also educational opportunities, health and other indicators.  Professor Nicholson from CUH Temple St  in his guest speech to the Ard Fheis placed great emphasis on the links between child poverty and health. The minister has also been silent on the area of childcare for this group – if their parents and other low income parents have no supports to arrange childcare who is responsible for it and how will parents be able to work?  I will return to the area of cuts to lone parents later in the week as it is a story of Budget 2012 that remains untold.

Simon Harris TD made a speech during a session hosted by Young Fine Gael on Human Rights where he talked about Disability in a way which I’ve rarely seen in a political setting. He mentioned rights, citizenship and most noticeably, for me anyway, the cost of disability and its impact on the lives of people with disabilities.

I want to make very clear that throwing money at the disability sector – as was done in Celtic Tiger Ireland – is not in itself a solution. It does not solve all the challenges faced by those with disabilities – be they physical, intellectual or psychological. Yes, funding and financial assistance is important but nothing is more important than recognising the rights of people with disabilities –rights that are the same as every other citizen in this country – and, importantly, beyond that, pditing in place the supports and the structures that they require to reach their potential, to make their contribution to society and to live their life as they wish.

… And let’s be frank with each other – even with reforming supports, evaluating systems in place and listening to the wishes of those with disabilities, there will always be some with a disability who will not be in a position to work or to take up education places. These individuals – full Irish citizens – are dependent on us – the general population and those of us in political life – to be their voice, to protect their rights and to ensure they are treated with dignity and respect. Our record as a nation in this area is shameful.

Responses to the lack of new policies and slowness of introduction of reform in social and equality areas frequently point to the lack of money or the Troika won’t let us do it.  How long can we as a society continue to restrict rights until people turn on each other or restrict people based on a pecking order of who is most deserving (or vulnerable)?

Much of the policy reform in the area of ‘the vulnerable’ does not need more money thrown at it.  It requires different ways of spending the money so that more people are helped and are given respect and dignity and full rights to participation in society.

I was thinking about Phil Hogan a lot over the weekend, absence making the brain grow… anyway. Whilst we have heard much about the propertied in the past few months between the household charge and those in negative equity, those who have nowhere to live or are receiving state subvention to rent could be supported to have more permanent housing.  If funds were allocated to renovate the many boarded up council houses, huge savings in rent supplement could be then made and jobs given to those with construction skills. It sounds a simple idea and one which many vested interests would no doubt rip assunder.

The focus on ‘the vulnerable’ has to be about more than pitying speeches and cliches whilst there is an increase in numbers of those on low incomes who are unfairly impacted by austerity measures and the recession.  Policy reform has to be inter departmental and Fine Gael Ministers for Justice and Equality, Health, Children et al need to review and proof each other’s policies (and those of their partners in government) and speak up in terms of rights rather than the continual adding ‘the half-pence to the pence and prayer to shivering prayer’ for the vulnerable.

Share

» 2 CommentsTags:

Fine Gael Ard Fheis 2012 Live Blog

March 30th, 2012 · Blogging, Irish Politics, Live Blogging

Hello from the Fine Gael Ard Fheis. This will be my doodle post for the day with my commentary and other bits and pieces I find of interest. You can comment by hitting that button up the left corner.

Share

» 1 CommentTags:

What Bertie told Ogun about sustainable development

March 27th, 2012 · Irish Politics

An interview. How humble. Sorry you have to click through to Youtube to watch it. But in case you forget what he sounds like and the sort of analysis €30,000 gets you.

Share

» 4 CommentsTags:··