Maman Poulet | Clucking away crookedly through media, politics and life

Boxing, money and the insignificance of domestic violence

January 11th, 2012 · Sport

Late last month World Boxing Welterweight Champion Floyd Mayweather was convicted of domestic violence assault charges and sentenced to serve a 90 day jail sentence.

Last week he managed to get that sentence deferred until June so that he could defend his world title. (An economic boost to Las Vegas being a primary reason offered!)

It’s farcial enough that those who licence boxing fights are allowing a convicted man fight under one of their sanctioned events, and a further embarrassment that its someone who has a history of domestic violence.

Yesterday Mayweather issued taunts to his potential opponent to agree to the fight and then you get figures like Rory McIlroy issuing responses like this.

Sports news bulletins have been feasting on the taunts/tweet all day but not a word of concern of how bad an example it is to have someone convicted of hitting a woman and children defer a sentence so that he can fight in a bout.

The head of world boxing has had a dose of the Sepp Blatters about it all.  Jose Sulaiman has said that he is in Mayweathers corner.

I have a feeling that Katie Taylor would not be happy about any of it.

Argentinian middleweight Sergio Martinez though has campaigned against domestic violence and today said that he would dedicate his fight on March 17 against Irish boxer Matthew Macklin to women affected by it.

There is some hope maybe in a sport riven by corruption, cable networks and dodgy deals. Rory McIlory might learn something from it before he starts backing someone who batters women.

Share

» 1 CommentTags:

Diplomatic hypocrisy?

January 1st, 2012 · Equality, Irish Politics

Today is the World Day of Peace, a Catholic celebration.  Each year it is traditional for the Taoiseach to issue a statement on the day in response to the annual statement issued by the Pope.  Frostiness or not in the relations between Ireland and the Vatican, Enda Kenny issued a statement this morning and indeed attended mass in Haddington Road with other politicians to mark the occasion.

In his statement the Taoiseach announced that Ireland would be seeking election to the UN Human Rights Council.

Both within our own country, and in the wider world, Ireland is at the fore of those promoting peace, justice, security and development. This is a commitment and an engagement that we take with the utmost seriousness that this why, this year, for the first time, Ireland is seeking election to the United Nations Human Rights Council. If elected, Ireland would support clear and strong action by the Council in addressing human rights violations and in promoting universal respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.

The Human Rights Council

is an inter-governmental body within the UN system made up of 47 States responsible for strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights around the globe.  The Council was created by the UN General Assembly on 15 March 2006 with the main purpose of addressing situations of human rights violations and make recommendations on them.

I assume before Ireland applies for election that

  • the Mental Capacity Bill will be debated and enacted?
  • The UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities will be ratified by the government.
  • Residential facilities for people with disabilities will be monitored and inspected.
  • All prisoners will have in cell sanitation.
  • Prisoners with mental health problems will be provided with appropriate treatment and facilities.
  • The Government will truly strengthen and maintain the independence of the Equality and Human Rights infrastructure in the state.
  • The Magdelene women will be cared for and apologised to.
  • Travellers will be recognised as an ethnic minority.

Insert other areas where Ireland’s human rights record is poor and we fail to meet international conventions

Put simply we should attend to everything else which should be required of us  before applying to join such an elite.  The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights assessed our record with regard to treaties and conventions last year and it and the Universal Periodic Review (draft report) show the concerns of the United Nations in many areas of human rights and legal protections.

Indeed the human rights record of many of the other members of the Human Rights Council is also far from perfect.  But is it too much to hope that we could lead by example and prioritise attending to our human rights obligations?  This could then be seen as ‘clear and strong’ action by the Government in ‘addressing human rights violations and in promoting universal respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.’

See what I did there?  Austerity can not be an excuse for such diplomatic hypocrisy either.

Happy New Year.

Share

» 7 CommentsTags:

This is not news

December 29th, 2011 · Irish Media

French lad wants to work in 33 countries in 33 weeks. Pulls a few pints and collects glasses in Brazen Head. Pub gets a plug.

Nearly broke business man writes a book. Shots of him in his businesses. Plug Plug Plug.

But PR honchos hope so and voila bored news editors think it is.

Share

» 2 CommentsTags:

Guest Cluck – Political Dynasties and Gender

December 21st, 2011 · Irish Politics

Johnny Fallon is the author of Dynasties: Irish Political Families which was published this month by New Island Books.   I’ve asked to him to contribute a post considering Dynasties, gender and the current debate on gender quotas in increasing women’s participation in politics.

Irish political life has been dominated by the power of big names.  The influence of family and contacts cannot be underestimated.   It is quite clear that when running for the senate or in a snap by-election, if you have a name people recognise and are positively disposed to then you have an enormous advantage.  Irish politics is highly personalised and despite perceptions of party loyalty the Irish voter tends to cling to a person or a name above any party badge.

It is also quite clear that those who come from political families serve a long apprenticeship.  There is no record of a dynastic member doing a ‘George Lee’ and becoming shocked at what a TD does or frustrated with the system and packing it all in.  They know exactly what they are getting into and this is a huge advantage to any party.

The problem is that it is difficult to say how many good candidates or Leaders have never had the chance to be elected due to the fact that they share a constituency with a famous name.  It is telling that almost half of all the women TDs that have ever been elected to Dáil Eireann hold a dynastic connection.  Indeed it is only in the last 20 years or so that real progress has been made as for many years being a female TD was almost the exclusive preserve of women who were replacing a father, husband, brother or some other relation.

The recent proposals on gender quotas will pose some interesting questions for the future of dynasties.  On one hand there are dynasties that will find it difficult and may just find themselves edged out as parties rush to get more women on their ticket.  However, where a dynasty has a strong female voice their position may become unassailable.  The introduction of quotas may well see far more daughters of politicians rather than sons running in the future.  A means to balancing a ticket, a recognisable name, and through family connections possessing the respect of grassroots workers and colleagues is the perfect recipe for success and will prove irresistible to the backroom teams headhunting candidates.

When talking of policies such as gender quotas many of the opponents point to an inherent anti-democratic bias within such a system.  They suggest its all about ability and nothing else should be considered.  There are a number of problems with this analysis however.  Firstly, my earlier figures on the amount of women TDs who had dynastic connections relate purely to those with a relative in the Dáil and take no account of the many more who are relatives of local councillors.  The amount of women who have come to politics of their own accord and built their name solely upon this is far less that their male counterparts.

This brings us to the real point, the real reason that quotas are being considered.  Our system of selection is based only on one ability, the ability to network.  Whether you are male or female you must follow the same ritual, the problem is that this ritual was established by and suits a far more traditional male lifestyle. You do not breeze in and out of meetings, you hang around, and you court the right people, the kingmakers.  You stay for a few pints.  You do this as often as possible night after night. You get involved with the GAA club, you get involved with the drama group, and you get involved in every group and society going.  You attend every fundraiser, you get to every gathering, and you get your mug in the paper. You get out there, night after night, you make sure to be friendly, stay on, have a few pints, and get to know the people.  Whether we like it or not, you can have ability coming out of your ears but people still want the friendly, amiable, decent skin who shows up to their gig regardless.
This problem affects all those who want to run for election.  But, disproportionately it affects women.  Let’s talk straight.  In Ireland today far more women than men still take on the main burden of responsibility for kids and family.  Going to meetings night after night is fine for a man who has a supportive wife at home, however the number of women who can rely on male support when they return from their long day in their tough job, is far less. Sorry, brothers I know I’m selling us short, but it’s a fact.  The culture of the political ‘network’ is hard to break.  If most of the local kingmakers are men, how does a woman impress in the conversation, over a few pints, is she comfortable doing it? What if she’s just not into the football?

The system was designed by men in an age when men did not worry about putting the kids to bed.  It would be considered a crime if someone suggested a political meeting or selection convention took place just after the school run, why? Because too many people are at work at that time.  It’s far better to hold the meeting at 8pm or 9pm when only the housewives or primary carers are stuck putting the kids to bed.

If women want a career in politics then they can come to it after they have raised the family.  However, the problem with this approach is that in the New Ireland more and more men are also taking up such duties and placing a higher priority on time with their family than their predecessors did.  The system is now also losing a small but increasing number of male participants.

If you come from a political dynasty you are already connected.  You already have a name to trade on; it is far easier to build the network.  Therefore it is quite clear that first we need to understand the depth of the problem and how the ‘game playing’ at local level is a turn off.  It cannot be changed by those who either use the system to cement their own position or by those who never faced the real difficulties of breaking into the network.  Change must be led by the people the system currently militates against.  Gender quotas do not have to be forever, however, they may be the only way to get such people in place that the change can be effected in the short term.

Either way, one thing is clear, political dynasties are resilient and built on enormous accumulated knowledge, they will find a way to change and adapt and grow within whatever rules are proposed.

Competition! If you would like to win a copy of  Dynasties: Irish Political Families by Johnny Fallon (New Island RRP €16.99)  please leave a comment below to be included in the draw.  Closing date 27 December. 

Share

» 25 CommentsTags:··

Equal Status, Disability and Bus Eireann

December 20th, 2011 · Disability, Equality

A wheelchair user has won a Equal Status case against Bus Eireann.  Karol Doherty submitted that the company should provide busses that were wheelchair accessible and that he should not have ascend the steps of the bus ‘on his bum’ or be carried up by a driver.  Bus Eireann thought carrying up the steps or other degradation of the passenger was ok.   To quote from the decision:

The respondent submitted that it had discharged its obligations to the complainant with respect to Section 4 by providing assistance to the complainant to get on and off the bus. Having heard the evidence of the parties in this respect, and, in particular, having considered the complainant’s description of the difficulties he experienced with this form of assistance, I am satisfied that it was unduly difficult for him to avail of the service in question. Furthermore, in considering the question of reasonable accommodation, the Acts require that the respondent does all that is reasonable to accommodate the needs of the complainant. In particular, it must at least consult with the person requesting the reasonable accommodation with a view to establishing fully the factual position in relation to that person’s requirements.

Mr. Doherty won his case as the Equality Officer ruled that Bus Eireann did not do everything it could and did not consult with him regarding his needs and how they could be met.

One day it will be agreed that being carried up or down the steps by the driver is not reasonable accommodation, or that you can turn up for a journey without having to decide 24 hours in advance that you want to go somewhere, or that you can expect the steps or lift on a bus to be in working order on all routes.  Indeed the headquarters of said company should be adapted without it being seen as above a nominal cost.  (yes they went there)  The respondent demonstrated that another company operating on the route were able to meet his needs.

This decision goes part of the way to establishing the rights of people with disabilities when using public transport.  There is still a very long way to go.   Congratulations to Karol for taking the case, hopefully more people with disabilities will be encouraged to take cases when they are refused the right to use a service and won’t take the excuses or the carrying anymore.

Share

» 1 CommentTags: