Maman Poulet | Clucking away crookedly through media, politics and life

Once upon a time in Disability Narnia

December 6th, 2011 · Disability, Equality

  • Miracles and instant cures from disability on offer from Irish Government.
  • Main-streaming will eradicate severe and profound disabilities.
  • Employers will suddenly offer jobs to everyone even if they can’t work.
  • Cutting disability allowance for young people brings them into line with their non disabled peers.

These deductions can be made by the defence strategy by Government parties of the cut to disability allowance announced yesterday.

If your disability meant that your family qualified for domiciliary care allowance when you were a child (ie it was a ‘severe disability’ and you needed constant care and attention) this disability will now disappear on your 18th birthday or half of it will until the age of 24.  Congratulations!  Well that’s what the government are implying whilst also not paying attention to the many other problems with disability policy in the land.

We are not talking ‘bad backitis’ here – these are generally people born with disabilities who are going to be affected including many people with autism and profound disabilities.  Not all people with disabilities need disability allowance but not all people with disabilities are shirking and avoiding employment either.

Lets follow the argument and really noble cause (if genuinely and properly resourced) of supporting people with disabilities into the workplace.  If you are able to work and happen to get a job, the costs of your disability, be they medical, transport, diet, heating, clothing, laundry are not taken into account and won’t be either by this cut.   You will continue to be taxed by default for your disability as in previous administrations.  You would lose your travel pass, more likely than not your medical card and aids and appliances. If it was costing you to be disabled and you earned the same salary as an able bodied person and you get no financial support or tax allowance for your disability and no cover in case anything went wrong why would you apply for a job which might lose you all those benefits?  Farcically your employer might get paid to hire you because you were less able but you would get no extra money to compensate for the cost of your disability.

If you use catheters or require bowel care support more often than not you can’t work because you need to use the services of nurses and others to attend to personal care and those services don’t work around people with jobs.  Also you are more at risk of infections and ill health and there is only so much of that an employer will endure.  You might have a PA service and that service may be cut and won’t help you get to work but only to get up in the morning and go to bed at night.   Employment and education are not seen as essential parts of personal assistance and home help needs assessment.  Making sure you don’t die in your bed and get a shower are now seen as essential.  If you are a young person with a disability who might be able to work you won’t get PA support because your mother/sister/any other adult is seen as your carer (if not decision maker) whether you want them to be or not.

If you had a PA in school or college you will lose that when you finish training/education and if you need a PA to work there is no continuity so some people can’t work.   Supports are not individualised.

If you wanted to work in the public service, you might have been able to get a job in previous years and had supports in place like flexible working, aids and appliances and a 3% quota.   The embargo has shut all those possibilities.

There are no extra training places for people with disabilities in the budget by the way so they will be competing with able bodied people for places in training.  Those who cannot work or attend training for employment, like ever, (and they exist and can rarely speak up for themselves) are being treated the same way as those who may be able to work with appropriate supports.  Everyone is being failed by this and miracle cures of disability abound.   (PS. There is a 20% cut in the resources for students with disabilities at third level in the Education estimates)

People with disabilities have been failed by the lack of needs analysis before and during the boom, now we are bust we are failed again.

Policy changes and real reform might see the needs of disabled people actually met.  But that would require some level of thought.  And a commitment to equality and respect.  We are not allowed have any of that.  Only miracle cures by policy makers who have no experience of disability who are advised by people who use medical models to diagnose and cure the disabled and not the society that we live in.  It would not actually cost more money in the long run, like moving people into the community has been proved to be cost effective,  supporting people with disabilities in terms of income support might actually reduce the overall bill and give people a life.

With this move people with disabilities may also be seen as a further burden on their families and more open to abuse and neglect and when they don’t get jobs or can’t get jobs will be singled out further for being seen as other and won’t be able to afford to participate in society and will be hidden all over again.

There is a better way.  A much better way of both saving money and supporting the participation in society of those with severe disabilities and protecting them.  However austerity means cut first and don’t look later. One size (cut) can’t fit all.

All the scenarios illustrated above from my own and others personal experiences.  (There is sarcasm in there too but the issues are all real).

We don’t have a strategy for people with disabilities, and no movement independent of service providers, funders or other vested interests (including our families) to  call out the inequalities.  Easy prey.

Share

» 7 CommentsTags:

Two women raise a baby

December 2nd, 2011 · LGBT, Marriage Equality, Same Sex Partnerships

Two women raise a young man who can speak well in public in Iowa last February, it goes viral again for some reason this week and lesbians and gay men and their friends go nuts about it.  It’s been all over my facebook and twitter with pre requisite gushing.  It’s not the video itself that concerns me (it won’t be the first or the last in campaigns nationally or internationally) but the reaction to it that is bizarre.

Are we so insecure about our sexuality and identity that we have to rush out examples of ‘good’ families and fawn after them. I know I’ve even done this myself at times over the past 20 years.

Why are ‘good’ examples in response to the right’s vilification of queer parents sought as part of campaign strategies?  The construction of the same sex marriage narrative as an economic development tool often accompanies this message tethering people to each other and their state to the disadvantage of others.

Single lesbians and gay men and single heterosexuals raise ‘good’ children too.  But the ‘two is better than one’ and ‘two marrieds is even betterer’ (it’s my blog and I can make up words if I want to) message of the marriage for gays and lesbian movement gathers offensive moss.

Non church going,  non ring wearing, anti cake topping,  attachment parenting disrespectful, possibly fuck buddying queers are raising babies or not raising babies.  They even vote.  And if they don’t marry or raise a child (or proud pooch) in a long term relationship akin to long term heterosexual relationships that doesn’t mean we’re not equal or not worth identifying and respecting in and out of our communities.  Equality for all should mean more than a big day out or another emotional heart tugging video.

Share

» 9 CommentsTags:

You know #Budget12 is going to be bad when

December 1st, 2011 · Equality, Irish Politics, Recession

Labour backbenchers (when not appearing on all TV/Radio programmes whilst their FG counterparts hide in the bushes) are issuing pre budget leaflets like this.

This is from Ciaran Lynch TD. If you see any other leaflets over the weekend let me know.
Nothing about equality there… all about hard choices and long term approaches. In fact this weeks buzz phrase is ‘straight talking’.
Share

» 2 CommentsTags:

Towards a Second Republic – Giveaway/Review

November 28th, 2011 · Equality, Irish Politics, Social Policy

Towards a Second Republic: Irish Politics after the Celtic Tiger, by Peadar Kirby and Mary P. Murphy was published earlier this month and is surely to become a key text for students of Irish Politics and the broader social sciences.

The book initially examines the impact of the Celtic Tiger both it’s development and operation on all parts of Irish society.  The authors look at the cyclical nature of boom and bust and its impact on the lives of people socially and economically.  In terms of equality and societal impact of the economic system the book questions the nature of the Irish state and the values if any that have been attached to statehood. They show who won and who lost in the first republic and it’s latest collapse.  There are frequent illustrations of who never won anything at all including people with disabilities, those living in areas of socio-economic discrimination and women.  Power was ceded to markets, new elites were created and centralised.

There are examination on recent debates on political reform and whether anything will come from them and what is is needed for real reform in Ireland which might lead us towards a second republic. (Political reform cannot happen in isolation to economic or social reforms and this has been a noticeable deficit in the discussions to date which many political scientists have engaged in or led. )  The programme for government is examined for any possibilities for more equal participation and benefits for those who have been excluded.

There is reflection on the role of civil society, left wing and progressive movements and political parties and they argue that the biggest challenge lies with the civil society movement rather than political parties.  A movement which as I’ve commented on before is riven with splits, financial controls of funders and failure to develop key messages.  The added impact of professionalisation and exclusion of those who are claimed to be represented is also critical in the challenges to be faced by this sector.

Many of the texts written to date on why we are in the state we are in do not look at the impact of the collapse on people or examine the structures created to manage people.  Mainly it has been reflection on what happened to buildings and those who built them and those that funded them.  This text remedies this hugely and will be essential reading not only for formal students of Irish Studies and the social sciences but also those interested in making a change and being part of the change in the nature of the discussions on austerity and the type of society we wish to live in.

I have a copy of the book which I would like to give to a blog reader.  If you are interested in winning it why not leave a comment with your email (which is hidden) and I will do a draw on December 5th.

Towards a Second Republic is published by Pluto Press.

There will be further book reviews and give-aways in the coming weeks. If you are an author or publisher and have a book that you think would be of interest to me or my readers please don’t hesitate to email me at tips (AT) mamanpoulet.com

Share

» 18 CommentsTags:

‘Sad News’ A Labour Party response to closures and silencing

November 27th, 2011 · Feminism, Irish Politics, Social Policy

As the voices of accountability and concern are silenced under the fog of austerity, the Labour Party stand silently by.

SAFE Ireland who support the development of services to women and children affected by domestic violence, count and document the numbers using the services and analyse the responses and need, lost their core funding and decided not to compromise themselves either in changing into a corporate/enforcement body for the refuge sector.    They are closing down and won’t be replaced.

The reaction of Labour Women.

HSE using savings constructively? Surely there has to be more of a response or critique than this?

Assume that you can insert the names of many other organisations into future tweets from Labour Women over the coming months as the HSE, Dept of Justice, Department of Social Protection and others withdraw funding to many womens, community and rights organisations.

Bondholders or improving the response of the state to women affected by domestic violence?

At least Labour Youth opposed University fees and joined the campaign.  Labour Women obviously don’t feel as passionate about the sisterhood.   Values? Dim distant memories.

Other organisations are being told of their funding cuts at the moment.  More will be told in the coming weeks.  I may make a list of the fallen – the previous government decimated the community development sector.  Now the rights and policy sector are up next for further possibly fatal cuts.

I don’t think groups should be kept open for the sake of it by the way.  I’m quiet happy to see PWDI gone – they were a group who didn’t do a lot, didn’t represent people properly and cost a lot of money doing it.  The really sad thing is that people with disabilities have no critical analysis or autonomous space as both philanthropical and governmental funding has proved not suitable to support people’s voices to be heard.

 

Update

Labour Women have commented to say that their tweet was not fully indicative of their response and that it was their facebook comment that was tweeted.

Share

» 10 CommentsTags:·